bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#790: marked as done (22.2.91; configure: checking for working mktime


From: Emacs bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#790: marked as done (22.2.91; configure: checking for working mktime... no)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:00:05 -0700

Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:53:07 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: 22.1.91; configure: checking for working mktime... no
has caused the Emacs bug report #790,
regarding 22.2.91; configure: checking for working mktime... no
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact address@hidden
immediately.)


-- 
790: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 22.1.91; configure: checking for working mktime... no Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:57:53 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
Please make sure to recreate `configure' with a recent┬╣ autoconf
version, otherwise it will hang for 60 seconds and finally decide that
mktime does not work if GCC 4.3 is used for building Emacs.  See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/03/msg00675.html.

┬╣ i.e. 2.62 or Debian/Ubuntu 2.61-7 or newer



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: 22.1.91; configure: checking for working mktime... no Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:53:07 -0400
OK, I've regenerated the configured file with 2.61-7, and I'll use this
to regenerate for the rest of the 22.3 release.

Thanks for pointing out the issue.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]