[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place |
Date: |
Sun, 03 May 2009 09:50:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) |
> I still think `split-window-vertically' is more appropriate because
> in a dired buffer it should unconditionally split the original window
> vertically. In such situations `split-window-sensibly' is
> the wrong method
> with the wrong technique
>
> It displays a new window
> in the wrong place
> at the wrong time
>
> For the wrong reason and
> the wrong rhyme
>
> On the wrong day of
> the wrong week
>
> Wrong
>
> Wrong
Kto-to majskij prazdnik otmechajet ;-)
BTW, here we call a bridge day "Fenstertag" (window day) and since we
didn't have any bridge day this week it _was_ the wrong day of the wrong
week indeed ...
I don't have any problems hard-coding `split-window-vertically' in
`dired-pop-to-buffer' but:
(1) `split-window-sensibly' with `split-width-threshold' nil _should_ do
`split-window-vertically' in the first place. If it doesn't, I have
a bug somewhere and must fix that.
(2) Someone might want `split-window-sensibly' do something special for
dired buffers.
So please try to debug this and tell me why it doesn't split the window
vertically with a dired-window-only-frame configuration in the first
attempt. It DTRT here for me.
martin
PS: It does not DTRT when there's another window below because it does
not restore the original window layout when the temporary window is
closed. But that's another story ...
bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Juri Linkov, 2009/05/02
bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, martin rudalics, 2009/05/05
bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, martin rudalics, 2009/05/18