[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#4084: 23.1; boxquote uses ugly ASCII "drawing" characters rather tha
bug#4084: 23.1; boxquote uses ugly ASCII "drawing" characters rather than Unicode
Sat, 8 Aug 2009 16:37:03 +0100
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 08:24:29AM -0700, Drew Adams wrote:
> > Much nicer! It would be great if these could be made the default in
> > place of the ugly ASCII.
> Sure doesn't look nicer to me! See attachment.
> Boxquote should not use Unicode characters unless the buffer is already
> encoded. Even then, I'm not convinced the Unicode version looks better.
I think your font is to blame here; perhaps it's using a fallback as
the corners, and as a result they don't line up correctly. Even so,
IMO this looks (subjectively) better than ASCII. I agree that
using Unicode characters in a non-Unicode buffer would be wrong;
boxquote should use a fallback in that case (can Emacs do
transliteration for non-representable characters when you insert
characters not represented in the buffer encoding)?
Anyhow, I'll pass this along to the author, since it's not part of
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.