bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#3932: marked as done (23.0.96; doc for `ad-*-arg*' does not mention


From: Emacs bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#3932: marked as done (23.0.96; doc for `ad-*-arg*' does not mention zero-indexing)
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:15:05 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:08:40 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: 23.0.96; doc for `ad-*-arg*' does not mention zero-indexing
has caused the Emacs bug report #3932,
regarding 23.0.96; doc for `ad-*-arg*' does not mention zero-indexing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact address@hidden
immediately.)


-- 
3932: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3932
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 23.0.96; doc for `ad-*-arg*' does not mention zero-indexing Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 11:16:09 -0700
Both the Elisp manual doc (node Argument Access in Advice) and the doc
strings of the functions that get and set args fail to mention that
POSITION starts at zero for the first arg.  The example in the manual
indicates this, but the zero-indexing should also be called out
explicitly.
 

In GNU Emacs 23.0.96.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2009-07-09 on SOFT-MJASON
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4)'



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: 23.0.96; doc for `ad-*-arg*' does not mention zero-indexing Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:08:40 -0400
> Both the Elisp manual doc (node Argument Access in Advice) and the doc
> strings of the functions that get and set args fail to mention that
> POSITION starts at zero for the first arg.  The example in the manual
> indicates this, but the zero-indexing should also be called out
> explicitly.

Fixed, thanks.

--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]