bug#4643: marked as done (two different definitions for handlerlist and catchlist in eval.c and alloc.c)

[Emacs bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
with message-id <200910190430.n9J4UFNE012243@godzilla.ics.uci.edu>
and subject line Re: bug#4643: two different definitions for catchlist in 
eval.c and alloc.c
has caused the Emacs bug report #4643,
regarding two different definitions for handlerlist and catchlist in eval.c and 
alloc.c
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
immediately.)


-- 
4643: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=4643
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> two different definitions for handlerlist and catchlist in eval.c and alloc.c
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>
>
> struct handlerlist and struct catchlist have different definitions in
> eval.c and alloc.c.
> This generates and error when using doing link time optimizations with
> gcc. 
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#4643: two different definitions for catchlist in eval.c and alloc.c
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>
>
> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>
>   > > If you don't mind setjmp.h being included everywhere, fine with me.
>   > 
>   > Indeed, I don't mind.
>
> Thanks. Done.
>
> --- End Message ---