[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#5114: 23.1.50; (string-to-number (number-to-string most-positive-fix

From: Helmut Eller
Subject: bug#5114: 23.1.50; (string-to-number (number-to-string most-positive-fixnum))
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:18:13 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux)

* Eli Zaretskii [2009-12-05 15:25+0100] writes:

>> From: Helmut Eller <address@hidden>
>> Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:36:41 +0100
>> Cc: address@hidden
>> +  else {
>> +    unsigned long u = 0;
> This assumes that `unsigned long' is the same width as EMACS_INT.
> This could be false, e.g., with 64-bit MS-Windows.  Isn't it better to
> use EMACS_INT instead?

Using EMACS_UINT wouldn't hurt.  Does MOST_POSITIVE_FIXNUM not fit in a
unsigned long on Windows?  I assumed that longs are supposed to be as
wide as pointers.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]