|
From: | Trent W. Buck |
Subject: | bug#5347: 23.1; M-x man: misreports absent man(1) as absent manpage. |
Date: | Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:30:38 +1100 |
User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> I realize that. This issue is because M-x man RET foo RET reports >> error in process sentinel: Can't find the foo manpage >> but it should report something like >> error in process sentinel: Can't find man(1) > > It cannot know. I don't understand why. Surely it can (executable-find "man") or even simply check the exit status (which will be 126 or 127 if man isn't executable).
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |