[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#6028: 24.0.50; HELLO wants "C-x v v"
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#6028: 24.0.50; HELLO wants "C-x v v" |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Apr 2010 23:40:51 +0300 |
> Cc: 6028@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@gnu.org>
> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:32:58 -0400
>
> If this is in an uninstalled tree, then C-h H opens the HELLO file that is
> managed by bzr.
Yes.
> The message that you see is what VC says when you try to make writable a file
> managed by VC.
> Is that the issue here?
The issue here is that the message is bogus. The VCS that is used
does not require "C-x v v" to make the file writable, because the file
is already writable under bzr. The _buffer_ is made read-only by
"C-h H", but the file is not. Perhaps VC sees that the file is under
VCS control and the buffer is read-only, and erroneously deduces that
the VC backend is some VCS of the locking variety. But that is false.
I think VC should not display this message if the backend is not a
locking VCS.
- bug#6028: 24.0.50; HELLO wants "C-x v v", Eli Zaretskii, 2010/04/24
- bug#6028: 24.0.50; HELLO wants "C-x v v", Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/04/24
- bug#6028: 24.0.50; HELLO wants "C-x v v",
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#6028: 24.0.50; HELLO wants "C-x v v", Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/04/24
- bug#6028: 24.0.50; HELLO wants "C-x v v", Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/25
- bug#6028: 24.0.50; HELLO wants "C-x v v", Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/04/25
- bug#6028: 24.0.50; HELLO wants "C-x v v", Eli Zaretskii, 2010/04/25
- bug#6028: 24.0.50; HELLO wants "C-x v v", Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/26
- bug#6028: 24.0.50; HELLO wants "C-x v v", Eli Zaretskii, 2010/04/25