|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables |
Date: | Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:49:07 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> It seems to make it more difficult for editing (edit-abbrevs) because >>> the buffer is full of empty abbrev. I wonder if saving only non-empty >>> tables is better and user friendlier. >> It does sound like a good idea. Any objection? > Would the following patch be acceptable? Actually, having tried it now for a while I do have an objection: it makes it harder to add entries to an abbrev-table if that table is empty. So I think a better option is to sort the tables such that empty tables are pushed to the end. Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |