[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#6241: Please make buffer-offer-save permanent local
From: |
MON KEY |
Subject: |
bug#6241: Please make buffer-offer-save permanent local |
Date: |
Wed, 26 May 2010 21:28:15 -0400 |
> importantly, I'm not sure how it'd affect existing code. Could someone
> investigate how safe would be such a change, and could someone argue for
> (and/or against) it?
I don't have a definitive use case where this is clearly NTRT but in
general I find these types of `globals' invasive and I appreciate the
luxury of being able to nuke them when and as I see fit. Let
third-parties put the variable as needed if that is what they/their code
requires.... esp. as they may have no idea whatsoever what _I_ will be
doing with _my_ buffers. From a user perspective it is often a burden
for me to undo this type overreaching.
--
/s_p\
- bug#6241: Please make buffer-offer-save permanent local, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/21
- bug#6241: Please make buffer-offer-save permanent local,
MON KEY <=
- bug#6241: Please make buffer-offer-save permanent local, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/26
- bug#6241: Please make buffer-offer-save permanent local, MON KEY, 2010/05/27
- bug#6241: Please make buffer-offer-save permanent local, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/27
- bug#6241: Please make buffer-offer-save permanent local, Stefan Monnier, 2010/05/27
- bug#6241: Please make buffer-offer-save permanent local, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/27
- bug#6241: Please make buffer-offer-save permanent local, MON KEY, 2010/05/28
- bug#6241: Please make buffer-offer-save permanent local, MON KEY, 2010/05/28
- bug#6241: Please make buffer-offer-save permanent local, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/28