bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:41:40 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
> CC: 8545@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> On 04/29/11 04:16, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > I also don't like the calls to `abort' you
> > introduced.  I understand the motivation (detection of invalid Emacs
> > code), but why not make it call `error' instead
> 
> Yes, that would be fine.

I installed such a change.

Btw, none of the platforms currently defines HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT or
HAVE_UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG_INT, AFAICS.