[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#4433: 23.1; dolist vs dolist

From: Drew Adams
Subject: bug#4433: 23.1; dolist vs dolist
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:26:40 -0700

> From: Drew Adams  Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 6:30 AM
> > If you have a definition of `return-from', then you have the cl.el
> > `dolist', so I don't really see the point.
> I don't see _your_ point.  There is no need to check 
> `return-from'.  `C-h f' also tells you which you have, by 
> referring to the source file.
> That's not the point.
> These two macros have the same name.
> These two macros have the same doc.
> These two macros have different behavior.
> This difference, with no corresponding difference in doc or 
> name, is a proven source of confusion.
> It's probably too late to make the names different and 
> correct the bad design.
> The doc should distinguish them, carefully and clearly, even 
> explicitly averting users to the possible confusion (gotcha).

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]