[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#9203: 24.0.50; some Clang experience

From: Peter Dyballa
Subject: bug#9203: 24.0.50; some Clang experience
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:58:28 +0200

Am 30.07.2011 um 14:27 schrieb Eli Zaretskii:

>> From: Peter Dyballa <address@hidden>
>> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:53:30 +0200
>> When using
>>      Apple clang version 2.0 (tags/Apple/clang-139) (based on LLVM 2.9svn)
>>      Target: x86_64-apple-darwin10
>>      Thread model: posix
>> to compile GNU Emacs on Mac OS X 10.6.8 with intel Core i7 it warns about 
>> some statements:
>> emacs-24.0.50/lib-src/../src/regex.c:6603:15: warning: 
>>      comparison of unsigned enum expression >= 0 is always true 
>> [-Wtautological-compare]
>>      if (ret >= 0)
>>          ~~~ ^  ~
> `ret' is of the type `reg_errcode_t', which is an enumerated data
> type, so its signedness is implementation-defined, AFAIK.  Why did you
> use that particular warning option?

I did not use any. Here is the configure invocation:

        env LANG=C PATH=/opt/local/bin:$PATH ./configure --without-sound 
--without-dbus --without-pop --without-gconf --without-gpm --with-ns 
--disable-ns-self-contained --enable-locallisppath=/Library/Application\ 
Support/Emacs/calendar24:/Library/Application\ Support/Emacs CFLAGS="-v -g -H 
-pipe -fPIC -fno-common -m64 -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -Os -fomit-frame-pointer 
-foptimize-register-move -ftree-vectorize" LDFLAGS="-Wl,-dead_strip_dylibs 
-Wl,-bind_at_load -Wl,-t" CC=clang CXX=clang++ 

I thick Clang tells us how to avoid such reports. At least I don't get the one 
cited when I add -Wtautological-compare to the CFLAGS and configure and compile.

Purpose of my report is merely to point to possibly unclean code. Clangs really 
reports a lot!



There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those 
who cannot.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]