bug#9222: 23.3.50; "void" is not "typeless" (but thanks for the koan!)

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Reuben Thomas <rrt@sc3d.org> writes:

> In semantic/bovine/c-by.el there’s the following description:
>
>      ("void" summary "Built in typeless type: void")
>
> Cute, but inaccurate: void is a type alright. I suggest changing
> “typeless type” to “empty type”.

I don't quite think that "empty type" is more meaningful than "typeless
type".  At least to me, "typeless type" makes more sense, even if it is
somewhat humorous.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/