[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#2179: 23.0.60; define-key vs define-key-after key syntax
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
bug#2179: 23.0.60; define-key vs define-key-after key syntax |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Oct 2011 01:08:13 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>>> The doc string of `define-key-after' doesn't say that it's only for
>>> menu-bar bindings.
>>
>> define-key-after is a compiled Lisp function in `subr.el'.
>> [...]
>> The order of bindings in a keymap matters when it is used as a menu.
>
> So?
Perhaps the point was supposed to be that the order of the elements in a
keymap ONLY matters in a menu, therefore there is no point to use
define-key-after with anything other then menu entries, therefore
define-key-after does not need to be extended to handle the same range
of key syntax that define-key can, therefore this is just a
documentation bug for define-key-after.
- bug#2179: 23.0.60; define-key vs define-key-after key syntax,
Glenn Morris <=