[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (fals
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive) |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:36:13 +0200 |
> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:05:47 +0200
> From: jari <jari.aalto@cante.net>
> Cc: kbrown@cornell.edu, 10257@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> User already has a write access to the device.
>
> Emacs just doesn't know / guesses wrong / environment is complex /
If Cygwin's implementation of the Posix APIs were compliant, it would
know/guess correctly.
> possibly uses wrong methodology (see Ken's notes about using uid, gid
> for write access check).
Let's see where the discussion of Ken's questions leads us. Only then
we will be able to conclude whether the current methodology is wrong
or not.
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), (continued)
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), Richard Stallman, 2011/12/14
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), jari, 2011/12/13
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), Ken Brown, 2011/12/13
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), jari, 2011/12/13
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), Eli Zaretskii, 2011/12/13
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), jari, 2011/12/13
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), Jason Rumney, 2011/12/15