[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#10654: 24.0.93; isearch-yank-line moved from C-y
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
bug#10654: 24.0.93; isearch-yank-line moved from C-y |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:54:16 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
"Aaron S. Hawley" wrote:
> I don't have any data to support that C-y is popular.
The weight of opinion seems to be against you.
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7700#11
I've always found the C-y binding in isearch "useless" and
counter-intuitive. I'd much rather make C-y and M-y behave like they
do in the minibuffer.
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8183#5
While I'm sure there's someone in the world who has a use for
searching for the entire next line, there are many, many more people
who find it useful to search for items from the kill ring.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-11/msg00687.html
I was reluctant about it in the first place.
> I can confirm that putting `isearch-yank-line' to the `M-s C-e'
> binding is unsatisfying (M-s C-k makes more sense).
Here is the motivation:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-11/msg00606.html
bind `isearch-yank-line' to `M-s C-e' because `move-end-of-line' is
on `C-e'.
> Though, without any data maybe I'm the only person who uses it and
> needs a short key binding?
[...]
> How about the shorter (and obvious) key binding of C-k?
[...]
> (define-key isearch-mode-map "\C-k" 'isearch-yank-line)
Personally I have no opinion.