[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11454: 24.1.50; `list-buffers-refresh', `Buffer-menu-buffer+size-wid
bug#11454: 24.1.50; `list-buffers-refresh', `Buffer-menu-buffer+size-width'
Sat, 12 May 2012 07:49:30 -0700
> > Here's what I would suggest: Respect a user's customizations and, in
> > priority, customizations of the new options over
> > customization of the old option.
> Absolutely not; that way lies madness.
Apparently you do not distinguish deprecation from desupport.
> As far as possible, outside of Customize only the value of the
> variable should have any meaning.
What does that mean? Who said anything to the contrary?
The suggestion was only to respect user customizations. And for `B-m-b+s-w', to
respect it only during the deprecation period, i.e., until it is desupported.
> I amended the docstring of `B-m-b+s-w' to explicitly describe the
> current behavior.
Why bother? You've effectively desupported it.