[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#11508: 24.1.50; Off-by-one error in xg_select?

From: Jan Djärv
Subject: bug#11508: 24.1.50; Off-by-one error in xg_select?
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 07:30:06 +0200


Go ahead and make the change.

     Jan D. 

21 maj 2012 kl. 00:44 skrev Ken Brown <address@hidden>:

> On 5/19/2012 5:52 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Jan Djärv<address@hidden>  writes:
>>> So the question is, is it more effective to give select the exact value
>>> (select works fine if nfds has a higher value than strictly neccessary),
>>> or always increment by one in lines 78 and 83?
>> IMHO it doesn't hurt to be exact, and the patch removes an inconsistency
>> which makes it easier to understand the code.
> So can I go ahead and make this change?  Jan, do you still object?
> Ken

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]