[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#12193: 24.1.50; 24.1.50; Completion broken in revno 109116

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: bug#12193: 24.1.50; 24.1.50; Completion broken in revno 109116
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:41:41 +0300

> From: chad <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:29:22 -0700
> Cc: address@hidden
> On 13 Aug 2012, at 19:50, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> With this recipe, it still happens in revno 109117.
> > 
> > Which is 500 revisions old.  Maybe you should resync.
> I wonder if this is a bazaar numbering issue? My first report was from a sync 
> that was less than an hour old; the second was less than 5 minutes old. I do 
> have a few private patches on that branch, so maybe that's my fault?  I'm a 
> bazaar novice.

If your branch is not bound to the upstream branch, then revision
numbers are useless, because they have no relation to the trunk.  You
should then use revision-ids, not revnos.

> P.S. I'll admit to being amused that my report mentioned that the cursor was 
> in the wrong window, and I got the reply ``but the cursor shouldn't be in 
> that window''. :-)

I never said anything like that.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]