[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#12273: 24.2.50; complex text layout

From: Kenichi Handa
Subject: bug#12273: 24.2.50; complex text layout
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:54:17 +0900

In article <address@hidden>, Peter Dyballa <address@hidden> writes:

> So the Fink variant uses libm17n and a modern libotf with
> OTF_get_variation_glyphs and the MacPorts variant has a
> bit older software. I launched both with -Q and them
> display the HELLO file and edited it to contain only
> complex scripts.

Thank you for the testing.

> I made a screenshot of both Emacsen side by side and made
> from the Fink variant's display a transparent copy with
> text colour in red and tried to position that over the
> same part of the edited HELLO buffer in the other Emacs.

Could you attach an image file of MacPorts version without
overwrapping with Fink verison?

> A few differences are visible. I cannot judge whether
> these differences are improvements, except for one: the
> Gujarati word in () seems to be in the m17n enabled Fink
> variant not OK – there is a low "accent" moved to the
> opening parenthesis.

Please show me the font names used for these scripts (which
are, I think, not-correctly rendered):
  Arabic, Burmese, Gularati, Kannada, Sinhara, 

Kenichi Handa

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]