[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13000: 24.2.90; underwave doesn't look as good as other IDEs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#13000: 24.2.90; underwave doesn't look as good as other IDEs |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Dec 2012 09:19:20 +0200 |
> From: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 01:54:28 +0200
> Cc: 13000@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> One problem is how to handle the tty case. On a tty frame
> underwave underlines and doesn't use the color attribute.
> So the question is what face condition to use to filter out
> displays where underwave is not supported.
>
> The already supported condition ((supports :underline t))
> doesn't take into account the underwave attribute,
> and a similar condition ((supports :underline wave))
> is not implemented.
Implementing the missing condition should be easy.
> Thus the patch uses the condition ((class color) (min-colors 88))
> to find the displays that should use the old face definitions
> without underwave:
This will do the wrong thing on 256-color xterm, I think.