[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#14062: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt

From: martin rudalics
Subject: bug#14062: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:22:00 +0200

> But for nil, BUFFERP will return zero, and the code that uses XBUFFER
> should not be called, IMO.
> But the uninitialized contents field should be zero, no?  Again, it
> should not pass the BUFFERP test.
> So the mystery still stands.

You mean that the w->contents argument of XBUFFER _always_ passes the
BUFFERP test first and then fails at the assertion in XBUFFER?  How can
that make sense?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]