[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#14087: [PATCH] Some fixes for refcard.tex
From: |
Xue Fuqiao |
Subject: |
bug#14087: [PATCH] Some fixes for refcard.tex |
Date: |
Thu, 9 May 2013 16:06:34 +0800 |
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote:
> Xue Fuqiao wrote:
>
>> (Sorry, but I cannot configure my email client to use `X-Debbugs-CC'.)
>
> i) That option only affects new reports, not replies to existing
> reports, so I don't see the relevance.
>
> ii) I guess your mail client doesn't let you add X- headers.
> Well, you can put it in the first line of the body instead.
> No, it probably isn't in the documentation.
Ah, I see. Thank you.
>>>> ! \key{eval {\bf sexp} before point}{C-x C-e} % sexp? form? expression?
>>>> S-expression?
>>>
>>> sexp seems fine for a quick reference card.
>>
>> In (info "(elisp) Intro Eval"):
>>
>> A Lisp object that is intended for evaluation is called a "form" or
>> "expression".
>> [...]
>> It is sometimes also referred to as an "S-expression" or "sexp",
>> but we generally do not use this terminology in this manual.
>>
>> IMO we can use "form" here since it is consistent with the manual and
>> not too long.
>
> A reference card is not a manual.
> The command is "eval-last-sexp"; "Evaluate sexp before point".
> Using the word "sexp" will therefore be confusing to literally no-one,
> and has added mnemonic value wrt the command-name.
> There is no need to change it.
OK, you convinced me.
--
Best regards, Xue Fuqiao.
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/