[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions
From: |
Jan Djärv |
Subject: |
bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Jun 2013 18:05:31 +0200 |
Hello.
9 jun 2013 kl. 16:25 skrev Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Jan Djärv <jan.h.d@swipnet.se> wrote:
>
>> If you can make it detect when to use macros and when to use functions so
>> -O0 doesn't suffer, that is starting the ball rolling. Otherwise it is
>> setting up
>> a brick wall for users/developers with older gcc.
>
> Also, in some environments updating to newer GCC isn't that easy.
> There's no MinGW GCC 4.8.1, and I wouldn't bet there will be one for
> many months.
Another thing to consider are other compilers. Clang is becoming more common,
and is available on all supported platforms (maybe not DOS). How does it
handle -g -O0? AFAIK, it does not have -Og.
Jan D.
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, (continued)
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/09
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/13
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/13
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/15
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/15
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/17
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Jan Djärv, 2013/06/09
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/09
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Jan Djärv, 2013/06/09
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/09
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions,
Jan Djärv <=
bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Barry OReilly, 2013/06/10