bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#15797: 24.3.50; Info: Mention cache-long-scans


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: bug#15797: 24.3.50; Info: Mention cache-long-scans
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 22:46:09 +0200

> From: Michael Heerdegen <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,  address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 19:50:03 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > > From: Michael Heerdegen <address@hidden>
> > > Cc: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>,
> > > address@hidden, address@hidden
> > > Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 19:02:11 +0100
> > > 
> > > BTW, when cache-long-scans t works now, is there any benefit in setting
> > > it nil?
> >
> > We will shortly turn it on by default, as you see from the rest of
> > this discussion.
> 
> Sorry, you misunderstood.  What I meant was: do we (perspectively) need
> a variable at all, when a nil value only has downsides?

You are rushing forward too fast, IMO.  Just yesterday you said the
feature was highly experimental.  Let's have it on by default for a
while, before we decide; meanwhile people will at least have a fire
escape.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]