|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | bug#16461: 24.3.50; electric eats too much |
Date: | Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:12:24 -0500 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> Looks OK, thanks. This difference between back-to-indentation and >> backward-to-indentation is really obscure. > Perhaps a new function with more descriptive name could be added later. I think back-to-indentation should use the same " \t" pattern rather than rely on syntax tables. Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |