bug#6355: 24.0.50; sit-for 0.0 returns nil without user input

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

"Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:

> I do not have an emacs -Q recipe.  If you just eval (sit-for 0.0) it
> returns t.  Executing some of the surrounding code I use also does not
> reproduce the problem.  But in my setup (too much to reproduce) it
> always returns nil for 0.0.
>
> Dunno if maybe it's picking up some non-user event as if it were input.
> I do know that without user input the return value is nil (in my
> context).

Is this still a problem?  I'm unable to reproduce it.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/