[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Feb 2014 20:47:03 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo@gmail.com> writes:
> Answering myself: yes, you used both of those options:
>
> In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
> of 2012-12-13 on ODIEONE
> Bzr revision: 111211 eggert@cs.ucla.edu-20121213021749-eyqqen0ewhn2hogq
> Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
> Configured using:
> `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags
> -IC:/Devel/emacs/build/include -Wall -Wextra -Wno-sign-compare
> -Wno-type-limits -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-pointer-sign
> -Wdeclaration-after-statement --ldflags -LC:/Devel/emacs/build/lib'
>
> So, if Drew doesn't get this backtrace again, I guess that the problem
> is in my build (unless it was an error in code, fixed between your bzr
> revision and mine). But I don't know what I'm doing wrong...
This was a year ago, so I'm closing this bug because it's thought that
it might be a build issue. Please reopen if still present.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=