[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Mar 2014 20:28:10 +0100 |
> 1. Ensure, I think, that the only calls to `set-frame-size' are from
> my calling `fit-frame' interactively (via C-x C-_). Nothing on
> `post-command-hook' that invokes `set-frame-size', for instance.
>
> 2. Resized a frame manually (with the mouse), so that the next call
> to `fit-frame' would actually change the size (to fit the buffer text).
>
> 3. C-x C-_ (`fit-frame'), which fit the frame, with no loss of the
> mode line.
>
> 4. C-x C-_ again, which fit the frame (as a no-op, no size change
> needed), this time with loss of the mode line (the bug).
>
> Attached is the log, *window-frame-dump*. After #3, I added a
> line of zeros to the buffer, to make clear where the second call to
> `fit-frame' (hence `set-frame-size') occurred.
Thanks. The problem is that while in the first dump Windows and Emacs
agree about the frame's pixel height as
frame pixel: 511 x 528 cols/lines: 73 x 44 units: 7 x 12
^^^
frame text pixel: 490 x 528 cols/lines: 70 x 44
tool: 0 scroll: 21 fringe: 0 border: 0 right: 2 bottom: 2
w32-rect: (0 0 519 608), (0 0 511 528)
^^^
they disagree in all remaining dumps
frame pixel: 728 x 828 cols/lines: 104 x 69 units: 7 x 12
^^^
frame text pixel: 707 x 828 cols/lines: 101 x 69
tool: 0 scroll: 21 fringe: 0 border: 0 right: 2 bottom: 2
w32-rect: (0 0 736 884), (0 0 728 804)
^^^
by 24 pixels, incidentally (maybe) the equivalent of two lines of 12
pixels. Please try two things now:
(1) Repeat the test once with a default character height of 11 pixels
and once with say 14 pixels so we can tell whether the two lines
paradigm holds.
(2) Try to replace `fit-frame' by (set-frame-size nil 101 69) so we can
eliminate `fit-frame' as possible source of the problem and have an
easier repeatable scenario.
martin
- bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line, (continued)
- bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line, martin rudalics, 2014/03/08
- bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line, Drew Adams, 2014/03/08
- bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line, martin rudalics, 2014/03/08
- bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line, Drew Adams, 2014/03/08
- bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line, martin rudalics, 2014/03/09
- bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line, Drew Adams, 2014/03/09
- bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line, martin rudalics, 2014/03/09
- bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line, Drew Adams, 2014/03/09
- bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line, martin rudalics, 2014/03/10
- bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line, Drew Adams, 2014/03/28
- bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/05
- bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line, Drew Adams, 2014/03/05
- bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/05
bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/03