[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set |
Date: |
Fri, 23 May 2014 22:53:14 +0300 |
> From: Ken Olum <kdo@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu>
> Cc: 17560@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 14:48:25 -0400
>
> OK. Here is a patch, including NEWS and ChangeLog entries. I made the
> argument to rmail-delete-forward not optional, and fixed callers.
Thanks.
But on second thought, what exactly was wrong with making nil mean 1?
What did you mean by "not consistent with rmail-next-message"?
Sorry for not asking that earlier.
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set, Ken Olum, 2014/05/23
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/05/23
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set, Ken Olum, 2014/05/23
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/05/23
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set, Ken Olum, 2014/05/23
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set, Ken Olum, 2014/05/23
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/05/24
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set, Ken Olum, 2014/05/27
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/05/30