[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#19791: 25.0.50; Bad HTML rendering
From: |
Matthew Carter |
Subject: |
bug#19791: 25.0.50; Bad HTML rendering |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Feb 2015 02:25:18 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net> writes:
>>>>>> Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:
>
> >> It specifies black letters, but it's a bug to blindly obey that.
>
> > Unless it specified this color specifically because it wanted the
> > text to be invisible.
>
> Except that the user should be free to override that.
>
> The “major” browsers already allow that, e. g., via the Stylish
> extension (see [1, 2]), and I believe that EWW should re-use
> their approach; namely: a. support proper CSS cascading;
> b. allow for custom (user-defined) styles.
>
> That being said, being myself a user of EWW on a 16-color
> Linux tty, I don’t see much value in trying to render
> HTML-specified colors, anyway. I’ve just disabled the feature
> over a year ago, – and never wanted it back.
>
> [1] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/stylish/
> [2] https://userstyles.org/
Is there a way to disable background colors while leaving font colors
in-tact? I hate having the background colored (either the full screen
or behind text), but a little color on the words is nice in my opinion
(I use a 256 color tty).
--
Matthew Carter (m@ahungry.com)
http://ahungry.com
- bug#19791: 25.0.50; Bad HTML rendering, (continued)
bug#19791: 25.0.50; Bad HTML rendering, Richard Stallman, 2015/02/07
bug#19791: 25.0.50; Bad HTML rendering, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/06
bug#19791: 25.0.50; Bad HTML rendering, Ivan Shmakov, 2015/02/07
bug#19791: 25.0.50; Bad HTML rendering, Richard Stallman, 2015/02/07