[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Peder O. Klingenberg
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 09:37:38 +0100
On 15 Mar, 2015, at 0:45, Daniel Colascione <address@hidden> wrote:
> What about defining a `process-lines-2' that takes keyword arguments and
> accepts a list for PROGRAM?
That’s another possibility, of course. But in my opinion, the &rest is usually
a more convenient API for the callers, saving them the trouble of consing up a
new list. Also, I find functions with -N suffixes to be less descriptive names
than they should be.
In my haste to send a patch last night, I managed to send the wrong version,
one that didn’t work as advertised. Sorry. Please ignore my previous patch
and consider this one instead:
Sløv uten dop
Description: Binary data