bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files.

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 05/23/2015 03:28 PM, Jan Djärv wrote:

> It has an example of how etags has behaved since forever.  Thats nothing
> new.

Being decades-old doesn't mean it's not a bug.

> Perhaps, but until someone does, there is no need to break things that
> work.

Someone already has: using 'ctags -e' (version 5.9~svn20110310, as 
distributed by Ubuntu), your scenario works even when tag-symbol-match-p 
is not in etags-xref-find-definitions-tag-order.

Here's its output:

x.cc,96
class XXXX
1,0
XX::foo()foo
9,58
XX::bar()bar
15,92
main(int argc, char *argv[])main
21,122

And here's etags' output:

x.cc,55
class XX1,0
XX::foo(9,58
XX::bar(15,92
main(21,122