|
From: | martin rudalics |
Subject: | bug#21380: 25.0.50; GTK-induced segfault when scheduling timer from window-configuration-change-hook |
Date: | Wed, 02 Sep 2015 09:02:31 +0200 |
> So maybe we should introduce a special copy_sequence_no_quit function > that never calls QUIT, and then use it for copying the timer lists. Yes. > Timer lists are never too long, so that shouldn't be a problem. Why do you think that copy_sequence_no_quit would be slower than Fcopy_sequence? The problem of copy_sequence_no_quit would be with circularity, not with length. martin
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |