bug#21463: 25.0.50; lisp-indent-line indents wrongly for multiline sexps

[Stefan Monnier]

> This is how the following sexp gets indented by lisp-indent-line
> ((x
>   y) a
>   2)
>
> This is how (I believe) it should be indented
>
> ((x
>   y) a
>  2)

I'd argue that for Scheme, it should be

  ((x
    y) a
       2)

But in either case, the current indentation indeed looks wrong.


        Stefan