[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#22120: 25.1.50; segfault while running circe
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#22120: 25.1.50; segfault while running circe |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Dec 2015 22:54:57 +0200 |
> From: Eric Hanchrow <eric.hanchrow@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 12:36:52 -0800
> Cc: 22120@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> Dunno if I'm doing this right:
You are, thanks.
> (gdb) down
> #1 CAR (c=...) at lisp.h:1244
> 1244 return (CONSP (c) ? XCAR (c)
> (gdb)
> #0 XCAR (c=...) at lisp.h:1216
> 1216 return lisp_h_XCAR (c);
> (gdb) p c
> $4 = <optimized out>
> (gdb) up
> #1 CAR (c=...) at lisp.h:1244
> 1244 return (CONSP (c) ? XCAR (c)
> (gdb) p c
> $5 = <optimized out>
> (gdb) up
> #2 Fcar (list=...) at data.c:527
> 527 return CAR (list);
> (gdb) p list
> $6 = {
> i = 7791354264813860195
> }
> (gdb) xpr list
> Lisp_Cons
> $7 = (struct Lisp_Cons *) 0x6c20736c69747560
> Cannot access memory at address 0x6c20736c69747560
That "address" is part of a string: "`utils l" (without the quotes).
So I'm guessing some code is overwriting the stack or writing beyond
the limits of a char array. The question is where?
bug#22120: 25.1.50; segfault while running circe, John Wiegley, 2015/12/08
bug#22120: Another backtrace, Eric Hanchrow, 2015/12/10
bug#22120: Another backtrace, Eric Hanchrow, 2015/12/12