[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#9130: Document Lisp mode fontification for strings after :documentat

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: bug#9130: Document Lisp mode fontification for strings after :documentation
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 20:47:00 +0200

> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 23:37:08 +0530
> From: Shakthi Kannan <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> ---
> | Also, you are marking this as documented, but in what manual did you
> | find this documented?  The original commit that added this feature
> | didn't include any documentation changes.
> \--
> Since, the patch has made the documentation updated in NEWS file, I
> marked it as '+++'. How else should I mark it?

No, that's a misunderstanding.  The NEWS entries that are not marked
by either "+++" or "---" (and the corresponding code) need to be
considered as basis for updating one of the Emacs manuals.  The "+++"
mark means the corresponding manual has been updated.

IOW, the unmarked entries in NEWS are hints for updating the manuals
due to changes since the last release.  They should be expanded,
enriched with whatever you pick up from the doc strings and the code
itself, and described in the appropriate manual.

Sorry, I think that was clear.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]