[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#22220: 24.5; no documentation for default process sentinel
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
bug#22220: 24.5; no documentation for default process sentinel |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:34:09 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) |
>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> It would be nice if the default process sentinel were explicitly documented
>> - at least the name and formal description.
> As for the name, why is that important? You can always get it installed for
> the process using nil as the argument to set-process-sentinel, and the
> implementation is in C, so how would the name help?
I must admit to a similar confusion. Aside from the fact that more could be
said: does more need to be said?
--
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
- bug#22220: 24.5; no documentation for default process sentinel, Ram Bhamidipaty, 2015/12/21
- bug#22220: 24.5; no documentation for default process sentinel, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/22
- bug#22220: 24.5; no documentation for default process sentinel, Ram Bhamidipaty, 2015/12/22
- bug#22220: 24.5; no documentation for default process sentinel, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/22
- bug#22220: 24.5; no documentation for default process sentinel,
John Wiegley <=
- bug#22220: 24.5; no documentation for default process sentinel, Ram Bhamidipaty, 2015/12/23
- bug#22220: 24.5; no documentation for default process sentinel, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/23
- bug#22220: 24.5; no documentation for default process sentinel, Ram Bhamidipaty, 2015/12/23
- bug#22220: 24.5; no documentation for default process sentinel, John Wiegley, 2015/12/23
- bug#22220: 24.5; no documentation for default process sentinel, Ram Bhamidipaty, 2015/12/23
- bug#22220: 24.5; no documentation for default process sentinel, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/23