[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#19421: 25.0.50; doc string of `browse-url' must describe parameter A
bug#19421: 25.0.50; doc string of `browse-url' must describe parameter ARGS
Sun, 27 Dec 2015 18:06:08 +0200
> Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 14:19:05 -0800 (PST)
> From: Drew Adams <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> > When called interactively, if variable `browse-url-new-window-flag' is
> > non-nil, load the document in a new window, if possible, otherwise use
> > a random existing one. A non-nil interactive prefix argument reverses
> > the effect of `browse-url-new-window-flag'.
> > So this part was already okay (in other functions as well).
> Sorry; I do not understand. The doc string speaks about behavior
> for when it is called interactively and when it is called
> I fail to see how it is called interactively, since it is not a
> command - it has no `interactive' spec.
It describes what will happen with the functions it calls, depending
on the platform. Those functions do have an interactive spec.
> And it refers to an "optional second argument NEW-WINDOW", but
> the lambda list is (URL &rest ARGS), and the doc string in no
> way introduces NEW WINDOW in terms of those parameters.
Please look at the current sources, you are talking about stuff I