bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp
Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 22:56:02 +0300

> From: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>
> Cc: rfflrccrd@gmail.com, 21072@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 21:45:37 +0200
> 
> > So if we say "either precedes or follows point" instead of "follows
> > point", all will be well?
> 
> Formally, yes.  Though I guess it would be a bit better to fix the
> commands so that it's behavior matches the docs.

Why do you think that?  Why is it better to always mark the function
that follows point?

Me, I think that the current behavior is a kind of feature, since it
lets the user control whether the leading commentary before a function
will or won't be marked.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]