[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#9300: 24.0.50; `bounds-of-thing-at-point' does not return nil when j

From: Dmitry Gutov
Subject: bug#9300: 24.0.50; `bounds-of-thing-at-point' does not return nil when just after THING
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:53:42 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2

On 06/20/2016 12:21 PM, Tino Calancha wrote:

* I agree with Drew that there is neither sexp nor list at point,
  so i would expect I), II), III) and IV) returning nil.

It's a matter of definition. If we say there is, then there is. We could also add a variable, of course.

* I) and II) agree

Do they?

but III) and IV disagree.
  I would expect III) and IV) returning the same value.

Agree. But will you be satisfied if they both return "(foo bar)"?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]