[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie
From: |
Alex |
Subject: |
bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:45:47 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Alex <agrambot@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 22:41:02 -0600
>> Cc: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>, 24720@debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>> I can see what the CFLAGS are in src/Makefile, thanks. Though it might
>> be nice if I could see these at the Elisp level even when they're the
>> default.
>
> The default switches are known, so they don't need to be spelled out
> in the report. It's the non-default ones that needs to be shown.
I agree that they don't need to be in the report, but just having them
in a variable (e.g. system-configuration-options) would make it easier
for users to see what the default switches are.
For example, I would have compared system-configuration-options between
the slow and fast builds and noticed that the fast build had '-O2' while
the slow one didn't, and this report wouldn't have been filed.
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Paul Eggert, 2016/10/17
- Message not available
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Paul Eggert, 2016/10/17
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Alex, 2016/10/18
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Glenn Morris, 2016/10/18
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Paul Eggert, 2016/10/18
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Alex, 2016/10/19
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/19
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie,
Alex <=
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/20
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Alex, 2016/10/20
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Alex, 2016/10/26
bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Cesar Quiroz, 2016/10/18