[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie
From: |
Alex |
Subject: |
bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:13:56 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Alex <agrambot@gmail.com>
>> Cc: rgm@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 24720@debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:45:47 -0600
>>
>> > The default switches are known, so they don't need to be spelled out
>> > in the report. It's the non-default ones that needs to be shown.
>>
>> I agree that they don't need to be in the report, but just having them
>> in a variable (e.g. system-configuration-options) would make it easier
>> for users to see what the default switches are.
>>
>> For example, I would have compared system-configuration-options between
>> the slow and fast builds and noticed that the fast build had '-O2' while
>> the slow one didn't, and this report wouldn't have been filed.
>
> You have that information in config.log, so I'm unsure why you
> couldn't find it if you looked for it.
Yes, in this case I could have looked in there, but that file is
overwritten with every ./configure, right? That means there's no
guarantee that what's listed there is for a given Emacs build.
I think that configuration options should be tied to, and viewable
through, Emacs regardless of the value it's set to. If report-emacs-bugs
needs to know when to hide the options, then perhaps a new variable
could be introduced for that purpose.
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Paul Eggert, 2016/10/17
- Message not available
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Paul Eggert, 2016/10/17
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Alex, 2016/10/18
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Glenn Morris, 2016/10/18
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Paul Eggert, 2016/10/18
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Alex, 2016/10/19
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/19
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Alex, 2016/10/19
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/20
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie,
Alex <=
- bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Alex, 2016/10/26
bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie, Cesar Quiroz, 2016/10/18