[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#24980: Fwd: tramp (; ido virtual buffer interaction

From: Dave Abrahams
Subject: bug#24980: Fwd: tramp (; ido virtual buffer interaction
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:33:24 -0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (darwin)

on Mon Nov 21 2016, Michael Albinus <michael.albinus-AT-gmx.de> wrote:

> From:  Michael Albinus <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: tramp (; ido virtual buffer interaction
> To:  Dave Abrahams <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 19:34:04 +0100 (2 hours, 52 minutes, 15 seconds ago)
> Dave Abrahams <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Dave,
>> VoilĂ :
> Thanks. And here is the story:
>>   expand-file-name("/wingy:tmp" nil)
>>   apply(expand-file-name ("/wingy:tmp" nil))
>>   tramp-completion-run-real-handler(expand-file-name ("/wingy:tmp" nil))
>>   tramp-completion-file-name-handler(expand-file-name "/wingy:tmp" nil)
>>   get-file-buffer("/wingy:tmp")
>>   ido-add-virtual-buffers-to-list()
> ido-add-virtual-buffers-to-list calls get-file-buffer. This calls
> expand-file-name, and Tramp becomes active. "/wingy:tmp" seems to be the
> file name related to the (still existing) buffer with the dead connection.
> There is no obvious solution, I will forward your report as Emacs bug,
> therefore.

Best workaround I have for now is to set `ido-use-virtual-buffers' to
'auto, which at least prevents it from invoking TRAMP until such a time
as I type a name for which there are no matches.  However, I'm guessing
`recentf-keep-default-predicate' might be fixed up to avoid this.

Thanks again,


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]