bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#24918: 25.1; Fonts can make Emacs grind to a halt


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: bug#24918: 25.1; Fonts can make Emacs grind to a halt
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 05:42:58 +0200

> From: Klaus-Dieter Bauer <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:42:38 +0100
> Cc: address@hidden
> 
> Ah, I missed that line in `C-u C-x ='. (I also don't see any message from 
> Clément). 
> 
> #### Using "emacs -Q" ####
> 
> It says for the ⇒ (\Rightarrow) symbol
> display: by this font (glyph code)
> uniscribe:-outline-Malgun 
> Gothic-normal-normal-normal-sans-17-*-*-*-p-*-ksc5601.1987-0 (#x22D)
> 
> For the ‖ (\Vert) and ※ (\textreferencemark) symbols:
> uniscribe:-outline-MS 
> Gothic-normal-normal-normal-mono-17-*-*-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0 (#x340)
> 
> For the symbol:
> uniscribe:-outline-MS 
> Gothic-normal-normal-normal-mono-17-*-*-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0 (#x364)
> 
> #### With init file #### 
> 
> (using Linux Libertine Mono as default font)
> 
> The ‖ and ※ symbols work fine in that configuraiton. 
> "⇒" still causes the issue here too, and falls back to identically the same 
> `uniscribe' line
> uniscribe:-outline-Malgun 
> Gothic-normal-normal-normal-sans-17-*-*-*-p-*-ksc5601.1987-0 (#x22D)
> 
> The extreme lag in `package-list-packages' seems to be caused by the ▲ symbol 
> in the **header line**,
> which works fine with the default font, but is substituted with 
> uniscribe:-outline-Malgun 
> Gothic-normal-normal-normal-sans-16-*-*-*-p-*-gb2312.1980-0 (#x240)
> when using `Linux Libertine Mono' or `Noto Mono'.

I think the problem is that these fonts have registry that is not
iso10646-1 (i.e. Unicode).

Do you have Symbola installed?  I'm guessing you don't, and if so, can
you please install it?  Emacs by default is configured to use that
font for these symbols, and with the correct registry.

> By any chance, do any of your test systems run Windows and have MS Office 
> installed? (In my case the 2010
> version.) It should be the primary source of Unicode fonts on my system. 

Yes, I do on one of my machines, and I don't experience these problems
there.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]