bug#25219: 26.0.50; ispell failing

[Reuben Thomas]

On 18 December 2016 at 16:08, Alan Third <alan@idiocy.org> wrote:

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 05:18:15PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> We definitely need to keep the -1 offset there.  (It was previously
> supplied by ispell-offset, but that variable was deleted.)  The reason
> for the offset is that the line we send to the speller has a "^"
> prepended to it (see the documentation of the Ispell interface for the
> reason why).

​Apologies for introducing this bug. I deleted this -1 on purpose, but I misread the (logical) sense of ispell-offset with respect to the version of ispell, so I managed to parlay a logical negation error into an off-by-one error.

--

http://rrt.sc3d.org