[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#25461: [Patch #2]: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@".

From: Alan Mackenzie
Subject: bug#25461: [Patch #2]: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@".
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 19:43:23 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)

Hello, Michael.

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 02:58:54 +0100, Michael Heerdegen wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden> writes:

> > I've hacked all this together.  What used to be called a "reader
> > macro" is now a "reader construct".

> Well, I liked my suggested wording more, but that's not a big surprise I
> guess.  I wonder what others think?

As I said to Noam, I don't thing "read syntax" is quite right.

> > diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/backquote.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/backquote.el
> > [...]

> I see that you already installed you suggested patch.  After a short
> test it seems to work as intended (FWIW, it doesn't work with Helm, I
> guess because Helm doesn't consult a completion table but reimplements
> the whole C-h f thing by itself).

That sounds bad!  I wasn't actually aware of Helm, but at the moment I
don't see why it would need its own C-h f facility.

> Regards,

> Michael.

Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]