[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#25671: Feature request: emacs -Q --script as a single binary
|
From: |
Clément Pit--Claudel |
|
Subject: |
bug#25671: Feature request: emacs -Q --script as a single binary |
|
Date: |
Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:45:55 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 |
On 2017-02-10 10:02, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Cc: 25671@debbugs.gnu.org
>> From: Clément Pit--Claudel <clement.pitclaudel@live.com>
>> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:17:00 -0500
>>
>>> I believe changing the program behavior depending on how it was named
>>> in the command that invoked it is against GNU coding standards.
>>
>> What about providing elisp or emacs-script as a separate binary?
>
> What about it?
Would that be OK? Could it work? I thought it would make implementation
simpler to just make the emacs binary ct differently based on how its invoked,
but if that's not OK then could we distribute a separate "elisp" or
"emacs-script" binary that can be used in a shebang line?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature