[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf'
|
From: |
npostavs |
|
Subject: |
bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf' |
|
Date: |
Wed, 24 May 2017 21:50:55 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
tags 27016 wontfix
close 27016
quit
> Can't you just `defsetf' unconditionally to a named function, and change
> that function's definition when appropriate (in a conditional)?
Or just
(eval-and-compile
(unless t
(defsetf foobar setcar)))
Anyway, I don't see any likely solutions to make this work exactly as
before, so I'm going to close this as wontfix, but feel free to continue
discussing (and/or say that I'm wrong).
- bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf', (continued)
- bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf', npostavs, 2017/05/22
- bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf', Michael Heerdegen, 2017/05/22
- bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf', npostavs, 2017/05/22
- bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf', Michael Heerdegen, 2017/05/22
- bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf', npostavs, 2017/05/22
- bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf', Michael Heerdegen, 2017/05/22
bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf', Rafael D Sorkin, 2017/05/22
bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf', Rafael D Sorkin, 2017/05/24
bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf', Rafael D Sorkin, 2017/05/25
bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf', Rafael D Sorkin, 2017/05/25
- bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf', npostavs, 2017/05/25
- bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf', Michael Heerdegen, 2017/05/25
- bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf', Noam Postavsky, 2017/05/25
- bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf', Michael Heerdegen, 2017/05/25
- bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf', npostavs, 2017/05/25
- bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf', Michael Heerdegen, 2017/05/25
bug#27016: possible bug in `defsetf', Stefan Monnier, 2017/05/25